<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Ryan TM - Latest Comments in Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://ryantm.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ryantm.disqus.com/non_violence_in_iraq_ryan_mulligan/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:48:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://www.ryantm.com/blog/non-violent-iraq/#comment-4535616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's conscience, not conscious.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DavidEGrayson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:48:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://www.ryantm.com/blog/non-violent-iraq/#comment-4425111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting, I never considered that the Iraqis might not be effected enough by the US army on a daily basis to care enough. I definitely believe that it is a probable situation though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Mulligan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:32:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://www.ryantm.com/blog/non-violent-iraq/#comment-4424460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the party. People have been saying this about the Palestinian territories for years. But I think the reason this hasn't happened is not because nobody has suggested it yet; nor is it (as I have heard espoused) evidence that the Arabs aren't interested in peace.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Believe it or not, I think the reason there has been no mass civilian uprising against the U.S. army presence is that the U.S. is not powerful enough in Iraq. In India, you had a well-defined, strong, foreign central authority. The average non-insurgent Iraqi, on the other hand, is not beholden to the United States in the same way: he is controlled by a variety of warlord-ish factions, by an ineffectual central government, and by an effective but certainly not omnipresent foreign army. In such a situation, it's hard to argue that staging protests outside the Green Zone would be effective; and it would certainly be hard for even a motivated group of Iraqis to convince a few million of their compatriots to join in that sort of action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the occupied territories in Israel, I think you could make the case that nonviolent resistance would have some effect. I think having a few million people hold parades at checkpoints every day would cause the glacier that is the peace process to start thawing out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jacob Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:22:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://www.ryantm.com/blog/non-violent-iraq/#comment-4424148</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are rite!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the spelling correction. I fixed it above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Mulligan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Non-violence in Iraq - Ryan Mulligan</title><link>http://www.ryantm.com/blog/non-violent-iraq/#comment-4414252</link><description>&lt;p&gt;more like goody-two-shoes-THROWN-IN-YOUR-FACE amirite?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(by the way, i think it's Gandhi, not Ghandi)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Chang</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>